Home | File a UFO Report | View UFO Reports Photo & Video | UFO Education UFO News | UFO Hangouts | UFO Groups | Extras UFO Discussion Boards | Calendar SkyWatch | Help UFOWisconsin | Links Contact Us Your complete source for Wisconsin UFO Sightings, News, & Information!

 

The Paul Schroeder Story

Thanks To Paul Schroeder

Website: http://iwasabducted.com/schroeder

Editor's Note: This is just the beginning of the Paul Shroeder story. To read the whole thing, click on the web site address above. Very interesting...

As an abductee for my whole life I have stumbled through unknowingness to suspicion to resistance and offer rare insights and advice to detect and thwart alien soul and body tampering Degrees & Certifications: published widely and recognized as an eloquent note in the chorus of barbaric yawps concerning experts who've never seen or confronted these myriad entities, personally for 45 years.

At night, your astral body travels to realms from angelic to demonic, a spirit world of myriad vibration levels and the pictures you see on the backs of your eyelids, while you R.E.M., are not dreams but visits, souvenirs of a greater reality. Like a goldfish who never suspects a greater world beyond the ponds surface, the limited awareness of humankind floats beneath the surface of a greater reality; groping, mouth agape in total ignorance.

Aliens have failed to hybridize, and now invade astrally to abduct, monitor, and possess; to entangle their energies with ours to ride the reincarnation roller coaster of our auras giving a new meaning to a silent invasion; these are my experiences. I am a fifty year old happily married father of two extraordinary teens. I am one who writes, landscapes, crafts his own ales, hunts mushrooms, breeds native giant silk moths, and teaches.

My wife and I have been friends and lovers for over twenty years, and she supports my hobbies and writing with a skeptical and cautious approach which has helped to keep me centered. I have seen different subspecies of alien entities since I was a young child living on Shore Road in Brooklyn until my later years as a resident of Long Island, and I am convinced that many others have also struggled to assess and grasp similar indigestible experiences which challenge everything we've ever been taught. Abductions and their remnant elusive memories have opened all this for me; a confirmed atheist until I saw aliens float me out of my body, in my bed, at night. Then I knew they were interested in an essence I never suspected I had: a soul.

Back to top

Alum: My Guardian Angel

Thanks To Suzi

Editor's Note: Here's an interesting account that points out the difference between alien contact (which is voluntary) being much different that alien abduction (which from what I hear usually involuntary). Suzi also points out an interesting tidbit about the term "aliens" and suggests that her contact has been with beings much like us, so are they really aliens?

In 1986 my now deceased husband and I were taken on board several times and I wrote a book of some of the experiences that led to this encounter. We were invited though and not taken. The book "Alum: My Guardian Angel" by Suzi Del Ray on booksurge.com tells of how it all began and some experiences as I am doing a second book now on other travels with my space brothers I prefer to call them. We after all go to the moon and yet do not refer to ourselves as aliens so I was told by the Commander of this ship to refer to them as Space Brothers and Sisters. If you care to know more here is a link to go to and view the first chapter and order the book if you desire:

http://www.fortunecity.com/roswell/spells/549/index.html

Thanks and Light and Love
Suzi

Back to top

Anti-Gravity Propulsion Hypothesis

Thanks To Russell E. Rierson

Editor's Note: Do you all have your thinking caps on? If not, I'd suggest going to get it before venturing into the following article. On second thought, maybe you better wear two of them.

Hello, this is the "hypothesis" of inertia-gravity and the conservation of momentum-energy, and spacetime.

A diffeomorphism is basically a map between manifolds with the term "manifold" a topological space which is locally Euclidean. An infinitely differentiable bijection also with a differentiable inverse.

An "inverse expansion" would be material and radiative contraction. A type of mathematical "inverse" of spatial expansion. Expansion and inverse expansion are defined by the wavefunction of the universe:

psi(q) = integral exp(-S(g)/hbar) dg
g|X = q

The integral is taken over Riemannian metrics g on a 4-ball whose boundary is X, and the integration is over metrics that restrict to a given metric q on X - that's what is meant by writing g|X = q. The quantity S(g) is the Einstein-Hilbert action of the metric g - in other words, the integral of the Ricci scalar curvature of g over the 4-ball.

I figure that both expansion AND inverse expansion ARE logically valid explanations! Defined by the wavefunction and inverse wavefunction. The intersection (a+bi)*(a-bi) = a^2 + b^2. The Pythagorean theorem - spacetime metric.

Remember the "T-Duality" of string theory? A type of isomorphism.

R<------>[1/R]

Really T-Duality says:
R<------->[{L_st}^2]/R

The physics for a circle of radius R is the same for a circle of radius 1/R .

So a type of diagram for the "self organizing" {self creating}, self containing universe, would be:

{<-{->{U}<-}->}

Infinity and continuity would be explained as quantum wavefunction "potential". Discrete finite particles (qwf intersection) would be explained as quantum wavefunction "actualization-collapse".

How can the "relativistic effects" be described by quantum wavefunctions, when the wavefunctions describe the position and momentum of particles in a background OF space?

In quantizing spacetime geometry, we won't get wavefunctions based on a background space. The space of wavefunctions can be thought of the space of square-integrable wavefunctions over classical configuration space. In ordinary quantum mechanics, configuration space is space itself {i.e.,to describe the configuration of a particle, location in space is specified}. In general relativity, there is a more general kind of configuration space: taken to be the space of 3-metrics {"superspace", not to be confused with supersymmetric space} in the geometrodynamics formulation,{or the space of connections of an appropriate gauge group)in the Ashtekar/loop formulation. So the wavefunctions will be functions over these abstract spaces, not space itself-- the wavefunction _defines_ "space itself".

The *process* is the "function of functions". Time is a function OF time. With flat sheets, foliations of space, or equatorial planes, the light cone cross section corresponding to a circle would be a "rotated" light cone near a massive object. Using abstract generalizations of course!

The two light cones form a relationship, describing degrees of rotation and circular-elliptic cross sections. It should be possible to derive a set of equations from these rotational perspective effects!

Non-Euclidean geometry has great explanatory power, yet there must be a type of "dynamics" involved, possibly related to a type of configuration space or varying density gradients. Static geometry cannot be the whole, complete explanation. Mathematician Roger Penrose demonstrated how many of the properties of three dimensional space can be created out of networks of spinors, the simplest possible "quantum mechanical objects". These spinors are used to define the two possible values of an electron's spin. He then generalized the spinor into a mathematical quantity called a twistor. The mathematics of complex numbers is used, which makes twistors hard to visualize. Geometrically, the notion of a point becomes more complicated, and secondary, defined by a conjunction of many individual twistors. A daunting approach mathematically.

Theoretically speaking, does the "absolute spacetime metric" exist?...Yes. Relativity does not prove that spacetime geometry is in all respects relative. "All-everything is relative" cannot be true. The overall spacetime structure must be stable and symmetric. The stability and symmetry are ultimately related to the existence of an absolute metric. Absolute relativity. Function and inverse function generate an axis-juxtaposition of symmetry, which can be hypothesized as an interactive temporally stratified display screen upon which the universe recursively shows itself a movie OF itself, as a process. The Eigenfunction diffeomorphism. Thus we realize that the universe is a self referential "quantum computer". All aspects of reality are intrinsic TO reality.

Time cannot merely be added on to a theory via an assumption as in the ADM formalism, whith Lorentzian manifolds, diffeomorhic to R x S with manifold S representing "space" and "t" an element of R representing time...

phi: M---> R x S

We need not invoke the "lumeniferous aether". The absolute metric must be a type of "meta-relation", as explained above.

The laws of physics would be distributed over space-time. Thus the equivalence principle results from the law: conservation of momentum-energy. This could also be interpreted as a type of Lenz' law for all mass-energy interacting with "space-time". The laws of physics are then a subset of mathematics.

The gravitational field, described by the metric of spacetime g_uv , is generated by the stress-energy tensor T^uv of matter. Various field equations relating g_uv to T^uv have been proposed. The mostsuccessfull have been the Einstein field equations which are of course, the foundation of general relativity.

G_uv == R_uv - 1/2 g_uv R = 8pi T_uv

where R_uv and R are the Ricci tensor and scalar curvature derived from the metric g_uv , and G_uv is the Einstein tensor. The equations are non-linear, since the left hand side is not a linear function of the metric.

When the gravitational field is weak, the geometry of spacetime is nearly flat and the equation is: g_uv = n_uv + h_uv , where all h_uv are << 1.

This linearized theory is very interesting.

But really, what is needed is a quantum theory of gravity-spacetime.

Successive sheets of space, sequential hypersurfaces parameterized by time, where time is not added on as an assumption.

Since the geometry of the universe can be explained as a type of language with grammatical structure, and the structure of that language is relational, space has no existence outside the relationships between things in the universe. Therefore the relation is self referential and recursive.

As Dr. Lee Smolin says: "There is nothing outside the universe". A closed circuit.

SOME VERY SIMPLE MATHEMATICS:

Dr. Georg Cantor proved that a one dimensional line of length "s" has the same number of points as the 2-D plane with sides "s". In fact, the number of points on the line would be the same as 3-D, 4-D, ... n-D and higher dimensional space. Very interesting.

OK, "A directed or 'oriented' line - a one dimensional 'manifold' - has for its boundary the starting point and the terminal point, both zero dimensional." A closed circuit.

The starting point is "negative".

The end point is "positive".

-A + A = 0.

-A------0------A

The starting point is also the ending point.

--------->
<---------

"The zero dimensional boundary of a one dimensional boundary of a two dimensional region is zero".

A true statement.

"The one dimensional boundary of the two dimensional boundary of a three dimensional region is zero".

A true statement.

Space is three dimensional. A cube or tetrahedron is three dimensional.

Also symmetrical.

Energy and momentum are conserved.

If a movie is projected onto a "movie screen", the characters in the film will appear to move "relative" TO the other objects in the film... and the objects in the film could be explained as moving relative to the characters...

Yet, the screen is a type of fixed reference frame. The "absolute".

A mathematical function has an opposite and an inverse...

A function{universe-time-process} and the inverse OF the function form an axis{n-dimensional manifold} of symmetry.

The diagonal of a square is at a 45 degree angle to the horizontal. The axis of symmetry, which can also be explained as the (velocity*time) of light.

The axis of symmetry is a fixed reference frame GENERATED by the relation and inverse relation. "c".

Thus by generating a field with 180 degree reverse spin properties in relation to the surrounding spin-property of spacetime, A "zero-inertia" effect can be produced. Zero resistance TO acceleration up to the limiting velocity "c" when the theory of "special relativity" forbids faster than light travel.

Back to top

That does it for this week - thanks for visiting!